Welcome back! After taking a little hiatus for the holidays (and to celebrate yet another dynasty championship!) it’s time to get back into the Keep/Trade/Cut series. This time of year is a great time for dynasty owners to capitalize on value, whether that means buying or selling. So for those of you who are unfamiliar with how this exercise works…
The rules are simple:
- Among a group of three (or more) NFL players, determine which one you would keep on your dynasty roster, which you would trade, and which you would cut.
- The catch is, within each group of players, you MUST keep at least one, trade at least one, and cut at least one.
The intention of this exercise is to challenge how you value certain players by comparing them to other similar players. The game is no fun if you pick obvious choices, but it is a good way to compare what variables and player traits you value most as a fantasy franchise owner.
With that in mind, this article is part of a series in which I play Keep/Trade/Cut, from a dynasty fantasy football perspective, with players who (1) play the same position and (2) currently play for the same NFL team. In this edition, I will examine position groups in the NFC North.
1. Bears – Wide Receivers (Allen Robinson, Anthony Miller, Taylor Gabriel)
Keep: Anthony Miller
Trade: Allen Robinson
Cut: Taylor Gabriel
Chicago presents a problematic WR situation for dynasty owners because Matt Nagy’s offense in 2018, while incredibly effective, was not easy to predict from game to game. In the Bears’ dynamic offense, each of the top three receivers
2. Lions – Wide Receivers (Kenny Golladay, Marvin Jones, TJ Jones)
Keep: Kenny Golladay
Trade: Marvin Jones
Cut: TJ Jones
The Lions would have been a more interesting discussion prior to trading Golden Tate to the Eagles, but they still present a slightly challenging decision. I fully expect Detroit to address the WR position this offseason, whether in free agency or the draft. Between RB Theo Riddick getting reps in the slot after the Tate trade, and TJ Jones getting starter reps after Marvin Jones was placed on IR, the Lions are clearly in need of some depth. That said, the easy decision amongst this group is to cut TJ Jones, who is clearly not going to win anyone a dynasty title. And, while Marvin Jones probably isn’t a long-term solution either, he also wouldn’t fetch as much of a trade return as would Golladay. So let’s look at some facts… Marvin Jones is still under contract with the Lions, but they could feasibly cut him this offseason without much cap hit. Jones caught as many touchdowns (5) in 9 games as Golladay did in 15 games, but that was due in part to a greater red zone conversion rate. According to Pro Football Reference, Jones caught 5/11 (45.45%) red zone targets for 3 touchdowns, while Golladay only converted 5/15 (33.33%) red zone targets for 4 touchdowns. Another year of development and some positive regression for Golladay could amount to a couple more TDs, and could really boost his already impressive 70/1063/5 stat line. And, although Golladay is sneakily old (he turns 26 later this year) entering his 3rd NFL season, Jones may only have a year or two left of his prime (he turns 29 this year). The target trends also seem to favor Golladay, whose target average increased significantly from 2017 (4.36 targets/game) to 2018 (7.93 targets/game), over Jones, whose target average remained more or less constant from 2017 (6.69 targets/game) to 2018 (6.89 targets). With a new offensive coordinator joining Detroit in 2019 (so long, Jim Bob Cooter), it’s difficult to predict how the offense will look, but I’m assuming it will feature more Kerryon Johnson and more Kenny Golladay. So unless I can get someone to overpay, I will bank on a breakout season for Kenny Golladay and keep him. I will trade Marvin Jones for a younger, high-upside player or draft pick.
3. Packers – Wide Receivers (Randall Cobb, Geronimo Allison, Marquez Valdes-Scantling, Equanimeous St. Brown, J’Mon Moore, Jake Kumerow, Allen Lazard)
Keep: Marquez Valdes-Scantling
Trade: Randall Cobb, Geronimo Allison, Equanimeous St. Brown, J’Mon Moore
Cut: Jake Kumerow, Allen Lazard
Let’s get this straight, right off the bat. The only Packers WR I want on my roster right now is Davante Adams. That’s it! I would be perfectly willing to trade anyone else on this list, and probably for a reasonable price. While any one of these guys could end up being Green Bay’s WR2 or WR3 next season, there are simply too many possibilities for me to have any conviction as to who those players will be. So that’s my disclaimer – sell everyone. But that’s not the game… So let’s cut the excess first. Drop Jake Kumerow, who should have never been mentioned in any fantasy-relevant conversation ever, and Allen Lazard, who wasn’t fantasy-relevant in Jacksonville and won’t be in Green Bay either. Valdes-Scantling is the only WR I will keep because he at least developed some chemistry with Aaron Rodgers, which is why he received the second-most targets (73) on the team, far outpacing his fellow rookie teammates. MVS gets the nod over both Cobb and Allison because both are set to become free agents this offseason, and neither was able to stay healthy last year. Allison has a reasonably good chance to return, but his value is strongly tied to Aaron Rodgers so I’ll trade him while I can, just in case he’s on a new team in 2019. I see a much lower chance that Cobb returns, and with his injury history and diminishing productivity, I’ll trade him for almost anything I can get. J’Mon Moore was selected the earliest in the NFL Draft (4th round) among all the Packers rookie receivers, but he collected the fewest targets (3) and receptions (2) among the group. I’ll see if his draft pedigree can net me anything in a trade, because the early returns on Moore are not promising. And last but not least is St. Brown, who along with Allison, may actually net a decent return via trade. ESB never received more than 5 targets in any game last season, but he is the youngest receiver on the roster (age 22) and possesses the size (6’-5”, 214 lbs) and speed (4.48 second 40-yard dash) that most NFL teams (and other dynasty owners) should covet. That said, St. Brown still fell to the 6th round of the NFL Draft, and was unable to beat out Valdes-Scantling when the opportunity presented itself. ESB seems to struggle with physical corners, and often lacks the precision route-running technique required to create separation. So I will trade him, and hope to capitalize on his physical traits and potential.
4. Vikings – Wide Receivers (Adam Thielen, Stefon Diggs, Laquon Treadwell)
Keep: Adam Thielen
Trade: Stefon Diggs
Cut: Laquon Treadwell
Ah, Laquon Treadwell… a case study in how NOT to draft 1st round wide receivers. Treadwell was taken by the Vikings 23rd overall in the 2016 NFL draft, mostly due to his size (6’-2”, 221 lbs) and production at Ole Miss. There were some concerns with Treadwell entering the league, such as his inability to separate from DBs and his lack of aggression attacking jump balls, but the most critical red flags were his athletic measurables. According to MockDraftable, his 4.63 second 40-yard dash time (13th percentile), 33” vertical jump (21st percentile), 117” broad jump (29th percentile), 7.05 second 3-cone time (30th percentile), 4.29 second 20-yard shuttle time (30th percentile), and 12 rep bench press (29th percentile) all ranked in the bottom third of all receivers since 1999. Treadwell could still stick around the league, as he is only entering his age 24 season and has shown improvement since his rookie year, but he will likely never live up to his draft stock, especially in fantasy football. I realize that’s a lot of information just to say that I’m going to cut Laquon Treadwell, but I included it here so it could provide some perspective headed into draft season… Conversely, Stefon Diggs was drafted in the 5th round in 2015 and Adam Thielen was signed as an undrafted free agent in 2013, and both are total studs. In 15 games in 2018, Diggs was targeted 149 times with a stat line of 102/1021/9. Thielen, meanwhile, was targeted 153 times and posted a 113/1373/9 line in a full 16-game 2018 season. So, although Diggs was on pace to receive more targets (159) and was quite efficient (68.5% catch rate), he was not quite as productive as Thielen, nor as efficient (73.9% catch rate). As I said before, both these dudes are monsters, so I would absolutely keep both on my roster if I could. But, if I had to choose (and I do), I would keep Thielen and trade Diggs. Because Diggs (entering age 26 season) is younger than Thielen (entering age 29 season), I’m betting I can get a ton for him in a trade. Additionally, I do think Diggs is slightly overrated and overvalued. The 2018 season, Diggs’s fourth in the league, was his first 1000-yard season, mostly because he still hasn’t put together a full 16-game campaign. In total, Diggs has missed 9 games in his short career thus far. Thielen, on the other hand, has put together back-to-back 16-game, 140+ target, 90+ reception, 1200+ yard seasons. And although he is pushing 30 years old, I can easily foresee him continuing his productivity well into his 30s, similarly to Larry Fitzgerald. Whereas Fitz transitioned into the slot in his later years, Thielen has played the “big slot” role for most of his career, lining up in the slot on 51.1% of his offensive snaps in 2018 (according to Pro Football Focus). While I acknowledge that I’m nitpicking, I’ll take Thielen because, ultimately, I believe he’s a more reliable dynasty asset than Diggs, who I will trade for a haul of picks and players. Be sure to check out past articles in the series, and stay tuned for future installments of Dynasty Keep/Trade/CutFollow @CRex_Designs Tweets by CRex_Designs